Discussion about this post

User's avatar
NewBlueOntario2026's avatar

What's really mixing up bond managers and their view on Fed forward dovishness is the stupid political feud narrative between Trump and Powell, in addition to managers either not wanting to admit they were sucked into the media narrative of doom and gloom and they're now stuck traders, or, they just hate Trump and should not be managing people's retirements point blank.

Expand full comment
Marilee Cordova's avatar

So what I'm understanding is that the fed's forward guidance is leaning towards cuts/pauses but hikes aren't even in the conversation which is where the divergence between the long end and forward guidance is? and that divergence shouldn't be there?

the long end is going up because the economy is growing (jobs being added = liquidity being added) and nominal GDP is expected to rise.

and as long as the FED remains with dovish guidance, capital will flow into risk assets (tech? BTC?), energy, and metals (copper included? since its more tied to manufacturing).

BUT when the FEDs tone shifts toward hiking, the markets will then shift hard and fast out of risk assets/metals/energy and into..?

Wondering how that last part ends and what "timing it" would look like? would the shift in tone at whatever FED meeting that happens at likely start a bear market? but since cuts are priced in at least til the end of the year, are we looking at 2026? (this last part is where I'm mostly struggling to understand)

Thanks!!

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts